“Give a man enough rope, and he’ll hang himself” ~ American Proverb
Michael Vick is going down. For the count. For anyone of my faithful readers who is unfamiliar with this NFL football scandal, I’ll do my best to bring you up to speed, though it is curiously possible that I will leave out some details. Feel free, as I am sure that some of you will, to correct me. Michael Vick, the 27-year-old quarterback for the Atlanta Falcons, was arrested on 25 April when police found 66 dogs in brutal conditions at his Virginia estate while there on a drug raid. Vick is changed with several felony offenses centering around an illegal dog fighting ring, which he is said to have financed, hosted, and used as a gambling circuit.
Today, Michael Vick has announced for the first time that he will plead guilty to charges of federal conspiracy as to avoid the further changes of dog fighting, illegal gambling, etc. that would follow should the trial and investigation go further. The fine is expected to be 250K, and carries a sentence of a year to eighteen months, however it is much more likely that Vick will only see six to eight. At greater stake is the quarterback’s future as an NFL player. The NFL has suspended Vick indefinitely following the trial, and they have reserved the right to have his suspension take effect after his jail sentence is complete. Moreover, the Falcons are thinking about releasing Vick from his ten-year 130 million dollar contract for breach of the document. Vick has already lost six lucrative endorsement and sponsorship contracts as well as having his sports card pulled from packs and official jerseys made unavailable for sale.
What prompts this subject (besides my NFL research as I get ready to give you all my NFL season preview) is that I thought until this morning that “dog fighting” was some sort of slang for some greater crime, perhaps drugs or something gang related. Surely not something as simple as pitting two dogs against each other would be cause to ruin a man’s career, send him to jail, and cost him millions and millions of dollars. As it turns out, here in America, the land of gunfighters and cowboys, the space race and independence; it is.
I’m not saying that what Michael Vick did was in some manner correct or that dog fighting is some sort of inherent American right; it’s not. Further, (and remember this before you post a comment) I agree with everything that this man is getting as it stands with all the circumstance of our society. What I am saying is that perhaps the label of ‘felony’ is a bit much. But I’ll get into it.
So this morning class was awash with this story. Not really because any of us give two-shits about Michael Vick. I thought that the guy was an overly-talented thug when he was drafted, I thought he was an overly-talented thug when he was playing, and I still think that he is an overly-talented thug whose incarceration and subsequent removal from the NFL is a good thing. Let it be a lesson to all those who within this league that think they don’t need to stop being from da ‘hood even when they make a few million. But I digress… More pointedly, the raid was initiated on his house originally to look for drugs because he had attempted to board an airplane with marijuana in a water bottle. I guess he thought that even though federal aviation laws now prohibit liquids from being carried on planes that they would let him go because he’s Michael Vick. Idiot. Further, his brother is currently serving time for drug possession, so it’s all good in the family. Are we surprised that this guy is less than a role-model for kids? I’m not, that’s how they roll in Hot-lanta.
But this isn’t about being a role-model, and while I would like to think that all professional athletes might realize that in some way and to each athlete there is some child (or adult) who looks up to them as, well, a model for behavior, I know that this cannot be the case for each player as every person, even millionaire athletes, are people too. If this was the case, Dennis Rodman would be in jail on principal (and rightly so), but so would Charles Barkley for remarks in the ‘92 play-offs and Bobby Knight… for being Bobby Knight. It understandable though. The NFL, MLB, NHL, and NBA should all hold their NCAA counterparts to higher standards of moral and ethical teaching for young athletes; perhaps repercussionary measures should be taken on Virginia Tech, I don’t know. But when you look at where an athlete comes from both in college athletic programs and university life, it’s often trademark as too who the bad apples are in comparison as to where the bad apple tree is planted. But this has only a little too do with the point of this post.
As I said, this is, at its core, about gambling and dog fighting. Gambling? Well, gambling is part of American history and lifestyle, period. And dog fighting? Dog fighting, to me, is not a crime. Perhaps distasteful and a bit macabre, but not worthy of criminal nature. There are cultures throughout history that value the mortal combat of both animals and humans. One of which is American history, lest us not forget! But I’ll let that sleeping dog lie, (no pun intended, I swear…) though I did not this morning… but to the point of animals fighting to the death for sport, one must realize that it’s still done all over the world. Popular is Arabia is the cobra verses the scorpion, something often done on the streets of bazaars and local suqs and always open to immediate gambling. In the same vein, in Afghanistan, there is an equestrial game played not unlike polo, but there are no sticks and the ball is replaced with the carcass of a freshly slain goat. In Japan, there is, of course, the siammese fighting fish rings; legal and gambled on. And in Spain the practice of bullfighting is globally known! Heck, in the Yukon there was dog fighting within our own history, though brutal. All the world over, there are countless examples, but the one I’ll look at the hardest to make my point is that of our neighbor Mexico: cockfighting.
Cockfighting is an elegant sport, and has a bit of a following here in the southern US, mainly Louisiana and Mississippi Delta region. In that arena, cocks are raised from birth to be fighters, fed special diets, exercised regularly, and in all honestly, live better than some of you treat your own pets! Inevitably, they die in the ring, and are disposed of, while perhaps not ceremoniously, but appropriately: they are often consumed in fire; not to be eaten. Personally, I see this as civilized. Some of you may balk, but consider how we treat poultry in this country? Have you ever seen a chicken farm? Hens roosting together so tight that they must shit on each other and are often infected with one or more cases of gangrene. In cases too extreme, limbs are removed, but the chicken is allowed to continue to feed a gluttonous amount of steroid-saturated grains, some of which are made from very bone marrow of their fellow fowl! Only at the end are they slaughtered in mass for our consumption. Now I ask you this: in drawing a lot that condemns one to death, would you prefer the life of a warrior or one of cattle?
To be sure, these were not the circumstances that surrounded Michael Vick and his dog fighting ring. Many of the dogs were abused, and kept in horrible living conditions. Also certain unsettling items were found in his home that are common in dog fighting. They included a ‘rape stand’ that holds aggressive dogs in place for mating and a ‘breakstick’ used to pry open a dog’s mouth. Furthermore, Vick himself has been accused of brutally executing dogs that either did not fight well, were not growing at the proper rate, or lost too many fights by electrocution, hanging, and drowning. This is not a question of the civility of dogfighting, but rather it is a clear case of psychiatric evaluation. However, it is shown that dog fighting, unlike cockfighting, can be undertaken with a minimal chance of the dog being killed; it is not necessary in most cases. It occurs to me that in an optimal scenario, dog fighting would not be so different than UFC or Pride Fighting. So while I am not defending Vick at all, I have posed the question to myself and now to you, if more humane treatment of the dogs was undertaken, would it still be a federal offense? Should it be? I don’t claim to have an answer, but it is worth thinking about. Especially when millions of dollars could be on the line!
I guess what I keep coming back to is that this is America… or at least some joking reflection of itself. This is the country that has produced rough men since its inception, and like it or not, that is our national identity. In a way, I can look at this whole thing as a massive tragedy with Michael Vick as our protagonist. I’m not sure as to when America outlawed dog fighting but I can promise you it was in this century. And I could venture a guess as to why such legislation was brought about, but I’m sure that you can make similar guesses as well. Regardless, it will stay illegal in practice because we as a culture are far to soft and sensitive to stomach anything of the sort. Our grandfather’s used to slip across the boarder to drink high-boles, gamble, drink, and screw. Now we only head south of the Rio Grande to visit our cheap summer homes and get readily available prescription (and non) drugs. Our grandfathers were stronger and had a greater sense of America then us. We only sense comfort and ourselves.
Sorry, got on my soap box there… but back to Vick. The man is a million-dollar fool. If he was so set on having a dog fighting ring for his own personal gain or even entertainment, then he had enough money to move it to a country that allowed such a sport with relative ease. Too bad he lacked the creativity to do so. But you have to acknowledge the fact that Vick is also loved by millions of fans, many of him protest for his release as I type. In a current poll, more people support Michael Vick’s case than approve of the President. So Atlanta, the NFL, and the USA lose a reluctant role-model. For what? Because there was something he liked that The Land of the Free did not allow, even though he ‘technically’ did not hurt a single living ‘person’? What if we weren’t so squeamish about the more “Draconian” side of our history? What if dog fighting was legal, but regulated, perhaps even ritualized? Humanitized? It is doubtful that Michael Vick would have attempted any of this… but I’m willing to bet that he would have had a front row seat for Friday Night Fights!
Lastly and overarching, what cripples an athlete sometimes causes me to think, is the penalty equal to the crime or is there a higher standard by the very nature of their being a held to a similar one. This is a paradox, I know, but if the average man commits this same crime he doesn’t lose millions or his future? Does a higher standard equate to different rules with greater penalties? It would seem so. As a military officer, I understand that I am held to a higher and different code of conduct and laws. But ironically, as the same people who support this higher standard for professional offenders say, he’s just an over-paid athlete.